翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Baldwin Steps ・ Baldwin Street ・ Baldwin the Eagle ・ Baldwin Township ・ Baldwin Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania ・ Baldwin Township, Barnes County, North Dakota ・ Baldwin Township, Delta County, Michigan ・ Baldwin Township, Iosco County, Michigan ・ Baldwin Township, Michigan ・ Baldwin Township, Sherburne County, Minnesota ・ Baldwin v Brighton City Council ・ Baldwin V of Jerusalem ・ Baldwin V, Count of Flanders ・ Baldwin V, Count of Hainaut ・ Baldwin v. Fish & Game Commission of Montana ・ Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. ・ Baldwin Valley ・ Baldwin VI ・ Baldwin VI, Count of Flanders ・ Baldwin VII, Count of Flanders ・ Baldwin Village ・ Baldwin Village, Los Angeles ・ Baldwin Vista, Los Angeles ・ Baldwin VO-1000 ・ Baldwin VO-660 ・ Baldwin Wake Walker ・ Baldwin Wallace Conservatory of Music ・ Baldwin Wallace University ・ Baldwin Wallace Yellow Jackets ・ Baldwin West Aerodrome Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc. ''Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.'', , was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a state may not regulate intrastate prices by prohibiting the importation of less expensive goods in interstate commerce. It established the principle that one state, in its dealings with another, cannot place itself in economic isolation. == Background == In 1933, the New York State Legislature passed a law which imposed a system of minimum prices to be paid by dealers to producers of milk. The law included a protective measure extending its application to milk from other states, thus ensuring that the prices set would not be undercut by cheaper imports. If the producer in the exporting state had been paid less for his milk than the prices fixed by the statute, it was illegal to sell or purchase the milk in New York. The purpose of the law was to assure an adequate local supply of wholesome milk and to secure the economic welfare of local producers. G. A. F. Seelig was a milk dealer in New York City who purchased milk from its parent company in Vermont. GAF purchased approximately 220 cans of milk and cream every day, 90% of which was sold in original cans to hotels, restaurants and larger facilities, with the remaining 10% repackaged in individual bottles and sold directly to consumers. The prices paid to the producer was lower than those prescribed by the New York law. Baldwin, the state farms and market commissioner, refused to license GAF's business because the dealer declined to sign an agreement to conform to the statute. As New York officials moved to prosecute the company for trading without a license, GAF brought suit against the state, in the person of Baldwin and other officials. In 1934, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a split decision, holding that GAF had the right to resell the milk in "original packaging", but not that which had been repackaged in individual bottles. Both parties appealed to the Supreme Court. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.